Life seems to be all about preparation for what comes next, but never about embracing the moment we're in-- especially when it comes to school. I remember halfway through fifth grade, we moved our school supplies from our desks to our lockers, because that's where we kept things in sixth grade. I later learned, however, that we only did this because in seventh and eighth grade, we didn't have our own desks and had to keep our things in our lockers. But this, too, was really only preparation for what was yet to come in high school, where we similarly stored our things in our lockers. So basically we started preparing for high school in fifth grade.
This idea of early preparation was taken to a whole new level at Linwood Middle School, a school in Brunswick, New Jersey where all students begin tracking their academic path (on an electronic planner) in sixth grade. According to an article in the New York Times, the goal of this is to "better prepare students for college, and motivate even low achievers to work harder by showing them that what they want matters, too."
Although I agree that it is important to motivate low achievers and show students that what they want matters, I have a problem with the idea that sixth graders are mapping out their futures. Why should they have to already deal with the pressures of college? One individual interviewed in this article, Mercedes Arias, has a perspective about this that I couldn't disagree with more. She says, "If you don't know yourself and think you want to be a biologist, you may realize in your sophomore year in college that you don't like science... You should have really figured that out sooner." I personally see college as an opportunity to experiment, and I think it's almost better if people don't know what they want to major in in college right when they get there. This way they can try out more than one thing. If a student has to pigeon-hole themselves and decide what they enjoy and dislike (academically) in sixth grade, then high school and college become stepping stones for a job, where they should be stepping stones for life. This is unfortunate because it means that students wouldn't have the ability to experiment different areas of study in college, and instead would only be able to move through their lives in one direction-- one decided in sixth grade.
When I read this article, it really struck a nerve with me. What do you think about this idea? Do you think it would be beneficial or be detrimental to our society? Why do you think we spend so much time preparing for the future instead of appreciating what we already have?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I completely agree with you. I think that it is important for students in middle school and junior high to be educated about all the possible choices they have classes wise in high school, and they should be motivated to work hard in school so that they have the opportunity to take these classes and not limit themselves. However, I strongly believe that it is wrong for 6th graders to be mapping out their academic path - why worry about college in middle school? To me, that just seems silly. I remember freshmen year when they had us fill out sheets to map out what courses we thought we'd be taking sophomore-senior year. Besides the basic core classes, I had absolutely no idea. And I've definitley changed my mind and developed certain likes and dislikes regarding subjects as I've gotten older.
So, yes I think that this is detrimental to our society - students should be motivated to work hard for their upcoming academic years, but not hinder their enjoyment for learning by focusing so much on 'what comes next'.
Post a Comment